Re: QS and spamc 0/0 status
Jason Haar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.qmail.scanner |
|---|---|
| Organization | Trimble Navigation Ltd. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Rejaine Monteiro wrote: > > If spamc fails, how can I *not* delivery messagens (requeue or some > like this) or even though sends alert to admin or restart spamd daemon?? > > You will have to rewrite Qmail-Scanner to do that. There is no simple option to turn on/off to do this. Historically Spam checking has been treated differently from viruses because spam isn't "bad" for your machine's health - it's more an annoyance than a threat. So a system failure (in spamd) is treated as not bad enough to force a requeue. If you don't want to fiddle around with Qmail-Scanner, you could change the "-s" and "-t" options on spamc to see if that helps, or write a wrapper for spamc that does retries itself. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV