Is Pine.LNX.4.44 known to mishandle digests?

The other day I asked whether the digest boundary was escaped
and of course the answer is yes, as one would expect.

I was just sent an example of a truncated digest by a Linux
Pine user, and sure enough, the digest seems to end right
at some guy's signature that's preceded by a long string of
dashes (too long to be taken for a boundary by a rigorous MUA).
This would seem to implicate Pine in an embarrassing bug, and
I thought I'd ask if anyone here knows for sure if Pine 4.44
(from the guy's Message-ID) is a known culprit.

I'll scratch around and try to contact Pine developers, but
in the meantime, this is sure a surprise.

Jim