CORRECTION Re: Couple of Questions

Ignore Question #1.  It's been resolved.
Sorry for the hassle.

Still curious about the nested parens in
Question #2.

Thanks in advance.



Stanley E. Laufer
Network Administrator
School of Library and Information Science
San Jose State University


On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Stanley Laufer wrote:

> First, thanks to those who developed Smart List.  It was
> exactly what we needed.
>
> Couple of questions:
>
> 1.  Currently, list subscribers do not receive a copy of
>     their own posting when they post something to the list.
>
>     I've checked the FAQ and the manual, and I don't see a
>     way to allow list subscribers to receive a copy of their
>     own postings.
>
>     For the time being, I've used the recipe from the FAQ
>     to set up an auto-reply, so the Sender at least knows
>     that their message was received and posted successfully.
>
>     But, for the long-term, I'd like to set it up so that
>     subscribers will receive a copy of their own list postings.
>
>     Is there a recipe that I can add to rc.local.s20 in order
>     to accomplish that?
>
> 2.  If I am manually maintaining the dist/accept file for a
>     particular list, and I want to temporarily comment out
>     a subscriber so that they will not receive list postings,
>     would this be the correct syntax:
>
>        ([email protected] (User's Name))
>
>     I'm concerned about the nested comments for (User's Name).
>
>     Will that throw off Smart List, or can Smart List handle
>     nested parens?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> Stanley E. Laufer
> Network Administrator
> School of Library and Information Science
> San Jose State University
>