Re: Subject line

Charlie Summers <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.smartlist.user
Message-ID <v0313034cba79a53e9187@[192.168.123.10]>
At 3:47 PM -0500 2/19/03, Richard G. Ball is rumored to have typed:

> Mostly because it is entirely unnecessary. All modern email clients that I
>know of let you filter your email into individual directories/folders.

   The one I'm using now is six years old, and it allows for this filtering.
Since this list is run via mailman (yeah, I know, the irony), the
X-BeenThere: header field is probably the preferred, although any of the
List-*: header fields would work as well. For SmartList mailing lists, the
X-Loop: header field is preferred.

> So, you can easily have a [smartlist] folder and a [photoshop] folder based
>on information in the headers that is already unique to that email list
>without adding extra text to the subject line (which I then have to strip
>off before I file my email).

   Yeah, I have an entire rc.mailinglist file filled with nothing but
recipies removing subject munges, removing footers, correcting list-added
Reply-To: header fields which destroy the ability to properly reply to
postings, etc., etc.

   NONE of this nonsense is necessary, IMHO, and the munges end up making it
_more_ difficult for anyone willing to spend a few moments reading the
documentation to their email client to properly manage their mail.

         Charlie Summers
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.