Re: possible feature request
Marco Paganini <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.active-spam-killer.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Wes, > I've been using ASK for quite some time. However, I've been seeing other > programs similar to ASK that helps with the auto-repliers. They have > incorporated a "human intervention" in theirs. It is one more step that > has to be taken in order for the email to go through. A person that gets > the "please reply to this message...." message, to enter a code number or > series of characters. From what I've been told, it cuts back quite a bit on > the spammers that have auto repliers. Recently I've been getting more and > more seep through the cracks because for the auto repliers. > > Now I know about the ones that scan the email for triggers to find the > number so they can respond with the proper code for a reply and such, but > wouldn't this slow down the spammers at least a little bit? > > Saw another one that sends a reply LINK to the user to click on and they > enter their email address and a graphic number. Is this possible to add in? Incorporating some form of "human verification" into ASK would not be difficult. I'm reluctant to add this feature however, because I believe it would make the process of sending email to someone very annoying. Some people have reservations to sending a reply to confirmations. Imagine if we add one extra step to it... The option of having a like would make life easier for some people (those with html-capable mail agents), but unbearable for others (like me, who prefer a non-html capable mail reader). If you point the URL to a link, you must also make sure that the website is always resolvable, or else you'll have senders unable to confirm... Messy, eh? I'm considering a modification against auto-responders: Right after the confirmation message is received, we send a quick email telling the sender that the original email was delivered. If the sender replies to this message (an autoresponder would), his/her email address gets automatically added to the ignorelist. I believe this would work. Regards, Paga -- Marco Paganini | UNIX / Linux / Networking [email protected] | PGP: http://www.paganini.net/pgp/ http://www.paganini.net | Magnus Frater te spectat...
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Mp80L2FWjNfH2XwRAm98AJ4gWlpqFDSSzdt1kaJvQi412VSeiwCgg+/W w1hcyptXkZuHODlBbNJ/15c= =Psq7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----