Re: possible feature request

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.active-spam-killer.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> I've been using ASK for quite some time. However, I've been seeing other =
> programs similar to ASK that helps with the auto-repliers. They have =
> incorporated a "human intervention" in theirs. It is one more step that =
> has to be taken in order for the email to go through. A person that gets =
> the "please reply to this message...." message, to enter a code number =
> or series of characters. From what I've been told, it cuts back quite a =
> bit on the spammers that have auto repliers. Recently I've been getting =
> more and more seep through the cracks because for the auto repliers.

I too have been using ASK for quite a while and I've never had a problem
with auto-replies kicking off the confirmation process.  I get about 1 out
of 1000 spam messages confirmed and it's usually one of the Nigerian 419
advanced fee fraud messages since some of those people actually read their
e-mail waiting for victims to reply.  They of course are quickly reported
to the mail host as a live scammer.  99% of my spam is advertising some
website or another and the from/reply-to addresses are usually forged.

> Saw another one that sends a reply LINK to the user to click on and they =
> enter their email address and a graphic number. Is this possible to add =
> in?

I don't respond to those that require more than a e-mail reply.  I'm of
the belief that e-mail is a text medium and I should not have to wade
through HTML code or go to a website to read/confirm my mail.  I sure hope
ASK doesn't implement such a feature, and if it does, it should be very
optional.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.