Re: possible feature request
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.active-spam-killer.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I've been using ASK for quite some time. However, I've been seeing other = > programs similar to ASK that helps with the auto-repliers. They have = > incorporated a "human intervention" in theirs. It is one more step that = > has to be taken in order for the email to go through. A person that gets = > the "please reply to this message...." message, to enter a code number = > or series of characters. From what I've been told, it cuts back quite a = > bit on the spammers that have auto repliers. Recently I've been getting = > more and more seep through the cracks because for the auto repliers. I too have been using ASK for quite a while and I've never had a problem with auto-replies kicking off the confirmation process. I get about 1 out of 1000 spam messages confirmed and it's usually one of the Nigerian 419 advanced fee fraud messages since some of those people actually read their e-mail waiting for victims to reply. They of course are quickly reported to the mail host as a live scammer. 99% of my spam is advertising some website or another and the from/reply-to addresses are usually forged. > Saw another one that sends a reply LINK to the user to click on and they = > enter their email address and a graphic number. Is this possible to add = > in? I don't respond to those that require more than a e-mail reply. I'm of the belief that e-mail is a text medium and I should not have to wade through HTML code or go to a website to read/confirm my mail. I sure hope ASK doesn't implement such a feature, and if it does, it should be very optional. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01