Re: non queue function
Marco Paganini <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.active-spam-killer.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Salvatore, I considered doing that, but... 1) There are a lot of mail programs out there that do not keep attachments in replies. Actually, I think most don't. 2) If something happens to the message that is sent back to a legitimate sender, the message could be lost forever. 3) In insane increase in bandwidth will occur... 4) We're opening ourselves to all kinds of Joe Jobs... Regards, Paga On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:24:53PM -0400, Salvatore Iozzia wrote: > I'm am concerned about the AMOUNT of spam tat would still be held in the > queue awaiting delivery. A way around this would be to included the entire > original message in the challenge email, so when the challenge is met via > reply the original message "should" be intact in the final delivered > message. I know some people me have their email clients set up to NOT send > original messages in their replies, but I believe that to be a minority. > Furthermore those people are savvy enough to follow an additional > instruction of coping or resending the original message with the challenge > response. > > If/when ASK catches on people will do what they need to do to work with it > and having the "keep original message in replies" will become standard fare. > > Regards, > > Salvatore F. Iozzia > accelerator/owner > Chain Reaction Web - www.chainreactionweb.com > Toll Free (866) 437-1585 - Support [email protected] -- Marco Paganini | UNIX / Linux / Networking [email protected] | PGP: http://www.paganini.net/pgp/ http://www.paganini.net | Magnus Frater te spectat... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com