Re: problem with Return-Path: <>

Marc Herbert <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.active-spam-killer.general
Message-ID <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402120058050.19380@fcat>
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Marco Paganini wrote:

> > 1) It seems a few mailer-daemons set: Return-Path: <>
>
> The Return-Path field represents what was passed as the "From" envelope.
> This is the address that MTAs use to send bounces. So, you should see it in
> any "MAILER-DAEMON" messages, as the MTA clearly does not care about bounces
> to bounces.

Thanks for the explanation.


> > 2) it seems a few sendmails refuse such return-paths
> >
>
> ?!? It's not up to sendmail to refuse such messages. If it does, then
> you won't see legitimate bounces to your messages.

> I'm confused...

OK... this was not sendmail actually but a light-weight clone,
"nullmailer".


> > I wrote the small patch attached as a workaround. Any comments
> > welcome!
>
> I'll check your patch.

No, forget about it: let's just call it a workaround for a poor
sendmail clone. I'll still use it though.

It was faster to code this workaround in ASK (Python) than to
fix the bug in nullmailer (C) :->




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.