Re: problem with Return-Path: <>
Marc Herbert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.active-spam-killer.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402120058050.19380@fcat> |
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Marco Paganini wrote: > > 1) It seems a few mailer-daemons set: Return-Path: <> > > The Return-Path field represents what was passed as the "From" envelope. > This is the address that MTAs use to send bounces. So, you should see it in > any "MAILER-DAEMON" messages, as the MTA clearly does not care about bounces > to bounces. Thanks for the explanation. > > 2) it seems a few sendmails refuse such return-paths > > > > ?!? It's not up to sendmail to refuse such messages. If it does, then > you won't see legitimate bounces to your messages. > I'm confused... OK... this was not sendmail actually but a light-weight clone, "nullmailer". > > I wrote the small patch attached as a workaround. Any comments > > welcome! > > I'll check your patch. No, forget about it: let's just call it a workaround for a poor sendmail clone. I'll still use it though. It was faster to code this workaround in ASK (Python) than to fix the bug in nullmailer (C) :-> ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click