Re: problem with Return-Path: <>
Marc Herbert <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:45:26 +0100 (CET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.active-spam-killer.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402130941250.27467@fcat> |
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Marco Paganini wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 01:02:13AM +0100, Marc Herbert wrote: > > > ?!? It's not up to sendmail to refuse such messages. If it does, then > > > you won't see legitimate bounces to your messages. > > > > > I'm confused... > > > > OK... this was not sendmail actually but a light-weight clone, > > "nullmailer". > > But if it refuses messages with a null return-path, how does it handle > bounces? Just curious... nullmailer is just a dumb SMTP forwarder, so I guess it does not have to handle "bounces". So maybe my patch has finally some interest, since it at least points out an issue in this specific "dump SMTP forwarder" case ? I really don't know SMTP enough to help more than what I've done so far. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click