(no subject)
"Thomas Schüring" <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:55:52 +0100 (MET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.active-spam-killer.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi a-s-k-users,
usually things seem to run smoothly,
but yesterday I lost an (important!) email.
Before I don't know the circumstances I can't sleep well ...
Maybe you could give me tip why and how to prevent further loss of mail?
Thanks in advance for your time!
I use fetchmail (5.9.11+NTLM+SDPS+SSL+NLS),
exim (v3.35-1woody2),
procmail (v3.22) and
ASK (v2.41 .deb).
http://www.paganini.net/ask/docs/ask_doc.html was used for the
configuration. (details below)
According to /var/log/exim/mainlog the email came in:
# 2004-02-17 09:45:44 1At0rP-0008E6-00 <= [email protected] H=localhost
[127.0.0.1] U=root P=esmtp S=8621 id=000801c3f531$e4447480$0206a8c0@darkangel
and exim gave it to the procmail_pipe
# 2004-02-17 09:46:03 1At0rP-0008E6-00 => me <me@localhost> D=procmail
T=procmail_pipe
# 2004-02-17 09:46:03 1At0rP-0008E6-00 Completed
My .procmailrc is setup according to (2.3.4 Procmail Users), starting ASK.
[email protected] is white-listed,
so ask.py delivers the message to stdout (according to ~/ask.log):
# 2004/02/17 09:46:00 [31642]: ----- ASK v2.4.1 Started -----
# [...]
# 2004/02/17 09:46:02 [31642]: deliver_mail(): Message delivered to stdout
# 2004/02/17 09:53:07 [31663]: ----- ASK v2.4.1 Started -----
And ~/Mail/.procmaillog says:
# From [email protected] Tue Feb 17 09:45:45 2004
# Subject: Fw: xyz
# Folder: /var/mail/me 8846
As I'm a bit paranoid, my ask-error-catching procmail-rule safes to a file.
But the lost email is neither there nor in the regular mailfolders.
[setup-details:]
I setup things according to the "Install and Configuration"-docs,
(2.3.2) "Alternative Exim Installation":
The "ask" parts were ordered _above_ the procmail ones.
That way "confirmation"-message were sent out,
but procmail wasn't involved so my mailinglists all went to
/var/mail/me
In the first time I *missed* (2.3.4) "Procmail Users",
so I changed the order:
1. procmail
2. ask
Result: procmail did work,
ask did not.
Then I read (2.3.4), added the two procmail-rules and things ran smoothly.
Do you have a clue what happened to this email?
If I left out any details, please ask and I'll provide it.
Once again thanks for your time.
Regards,
Thomas
--
Manche Menschen haben einen Gesichtskreis vom Radius Null.
Und diesen nennen sie Standpunkt.
--
GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz, 2,99 EUR/Monat...)
jetzt 3 Monate GRATIS + 3x DER SPIEGEL +++ http://www.gmx.net/derspiegel +++
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click