Re: [iserver] Active Spam Killer (ASK)
"Salvatore F. Iozzia" <[email protected]> Sat, 8 May 2004 21:43:20 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.active-spam-killer.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <228901c43567$01dc60a0$6501a8c0@Telios> |
Im about to implement the ASK system on my server. This is why: 1. I use an separate email ticket queue system to handle all my business related email for support, sales, resellers, etc. 2. this leaves my personal email address available for direct contacts of which I would have given my address out for a specific purpose. 3. ASK has addresses most if not all the issues, if newsletters, fake replies, whitelist management etc. 4. ASK has a imanager like interface to viewing emails in the queue that are awaiting approval. 5. unlike third party services, your sender does not have to click a link, or see ads, or be prompted to buy anything. they just reply once to your email and whamo they are whitelisted. 6. ASK has a nice support site and an active mail list http://www.paganini.net/ask/ 7. people are sick of spam and will be sympathetic to any reasonable action requested of them to curb it 8. its free and runs on your server, its not a third party service that cost your customers extra. 9 you can actually charge extra for it as a service :) 10 its optional like spamassassin each user has to turn it on and figure out how to use it the only reason I have not done it yet is I have not had the time to implement it. Im a vinstall kinda guy when it comes to these kinds of things. I don't like the idea of breaking my mail server while install something. So I am going to pay to have it implemented to a secondary VPS. the web interface is written in perl and look ALOT like Imanager I will integrating the two at some time in the future. For the record, I believe that challenge response systems are the best way to handle email delivery in conjunction with new SMTP authentication which is years off from being standard. Basically, each piece of mail should be traceable back to a valid recipient. Anyone using IM to collaborate knows that whitelist are easy to manage based on the fact that a buddy list or address book is essentially whitelist. Regards, Salvatore F. Iozzia accelerator/owner Chain Reaction Web - www.chainreactionweb.com Toll Free (866) 437-1585 - Support [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Lock" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 1:54 PM Subject: Re: [iserver] Active Spam Killer (ASK) > At 10:30 AM 5/7/2004 -0700, you wrote: > >not having looked at ASK, here's an email I wrote on Challenge-Response > >systems when someone brought up Spam Arrest: > > That pretty much covers the highlights, thanks for posting it again. I > have had a number of customers request a challenge/response solution to cut > down on the spam load. Based on responses like yours, I have convinced > them the cure may be worse than the disease. I agree, a good filtering > system overseen by humans is still the better solution. > > Cheers! > > John Lock - VP, Technology > ============================== > R e l e v a n t A r t s > d e s i g n - i d e n t i t y - n e w m e d i a > http://www.relevantarts.com/ > Voice: 770-914-0855 > Toll free: 1-888-234-4188 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click