Re: RE: ASK confirmation code, wrapped lines etc.
Marc Herbert <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:46:19 +0300 (EEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.active-spam-killer.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407191145210.15585@fcat> |
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Rob Nielson wrote: > > * Big Emails: What do do with big emails? Do we scan the entire email > > for the key or just, say, the first 100 lines? Scanning the entire email > > means more CPU use, which is bad. > With today's CPU speeds, we're talking about nanoseconds to scan an Email. I don't agree: I suspect some people are already using ASK on servers, which may be already tight on power due to a huge number of messages per second processed. Once you gave some performance to users, you can never take it back :-) Moreover, you can imagine some kind of very easy DoS attack, sending huge messages to some ASK server... > If, for the odd event, the Email is exessively huge, then just include the > first 20, 30, 50... or whatever... number of lines. Preferred. Even if moving the confirmation code to the body of the message may seem a better solution in the long term, finding out why the subject line gets wrapped would fix the issue much sooner. I really feel like it's ASK's fault here, as I never saw any wrapped subject line before using ASK. From RFC 2822 <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html> section 2.2.1, I even understand that wrapped subject lines are "forbidden". I wonder how most mail software would handle such broken messages; they would probably seldom come to the recipient. Cheers, Marc. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idG21&alloc_id040&op=click