Re: Friday news
Adam Back <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:06:20 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.hashcash,gmane.mail.spam.camram |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I notice in that article that it says CAMRAM requires 23 bit hashcash stamps. This is a stamp considered of sufficient value to add a user to a whitelist, right? I wonder if it would make sense to take the default 20 bit hashcash token as a once-off exemption from challenge-response / filtering false-positive, to improve hashcash interop story. (Once-off so that next time the hashcash user still needs to send a new token as no auto-whitelisting has occurred.) Adam On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:09:36AM -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/wo_johansson032604.asp