Re: crm versions in CVS
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.crm114 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bill Y wrote: > From: Jason Lewis <[email protected]> > > Hi Guys, > > It seems to me that the version control of crm is a little bit complex, > I'm not a source control expert but shouldn't all the versions of crm114 > be in CVS and tagged appropriately so one could just get the tag required? > > And shouldn't each user's repository be a branch from trunk? I'm not > sure CVS can manage branches properly, but afaik, SVN can do branching > quite well. > > And also, maybe the crm code should be separate from the mailfilter and > mailreaver code? This would make managing installations easier for > admins I think. > > Just my two cents worth. > > Yes, and no. > > Though you are *probably* right that some kind of source code control > would be a darn good idea, the problem is that I've had some exceedingly > bad experiences with CVS / Subversion and found that Sourceforge's > systems to be less than useless. ... > And, philosopically speaking, I'm morally opposed to having a single > point of failure such as Sourceforge's server (which by the way they > do NOT warrant in any way). IMO, bzr would best match the behavior displayed on this list. you can also use launchpad as a public archive. http://bazaar-vcs.org/ http://doc.bazaar-vcs.org/bzr.dev/en/mini-tutorial/index.html -- Speech-recognition in use. It makes mistakes, I correct some. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/