Re: crm versions in CVS

Corey Halpin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.crm114
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2008-03-26, Johannes Berg wrote:
> While that is possible, the resulting trees will most likely not be
> mergeable because at some point some slightly different patch
> description will creep in.
 
  I see two points here:
  1. under a dvcs, trees diverge over time and become difficult (sometimes 
impossible) to merge.  This would seem to be a general problem of any 
distributed system, and also one that is media independent.

  2. Slightly different patch descriptions cause problems under git.  I've not 
used git in a multi-person setting, and am not terribly familiar with its 
quirks.  So I really don't know what this means.

  As to problem #1, I don't see how a central server solves it.  Notifies you 
sooner maybe, but doesn't the problem still exist?

  As to problem #2, doesn't this just mean that a naming convention for 
patches needs to be proposed and enforced which makes the names be unique?

  Would these issues be mitigated (or even resolved) if every release also had 
a tarball of the git repository from whence it came, on which developers were 
expected to rebase their local repositories?

  It just seems, at least to me, that for a dvcs which supports patch exchange 
over email, there should be some functional workflow which doesn't require 
anyone to have a central server.  Maybe it requires a little bit more book 
keeping than with a central server, sure.  But it's got to be less book work 
than the devs do now.

~crh

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace

_______________________________________________
Crm114-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crm114-general
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkfqeLYACgkQQ/a2GD73knu+OgCeJHfRvF8cPA1+nhDsBERYdG6h
MxgAoMe9m1WlFzxt5zpD/xiokFAk7bsj
=XET2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.