Re: Strange segfault with improper usage

>>>>> "P" == Paolo  <[email protected]> writes:

    P> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 01:11:47PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
    >> I've reproduced it now.  The patched version doesn't segfault
    >> anymore.

    P> *reproduced* what? the bug?

The segfault in the original unpatched version (I couldn't reproduce it
earlier today).  The patched version works fine.  So the patch fixes the
problem on my sites.

    >> So the fix helps on both my machines where I tested the error.

    P> I'm confused, and more so after reading also reports from dbts -
    P> did anyone manage to *reproduce the bug* =
    P> patched-crm-segv-on-some-test-case-again ?

As I understand it Helmut (the original reporter) could still get it to
segfault on some machine.  But I don't know what TRE version he uses
there, I suspect it's 0.7.3.  I've asked him for clarification and
further testing (you were CCed), so we should hear more from him.

Regards,

Milan Zamazal


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace