Re: And another crm114 script language question about 'isolate'
"Ger Hobbelt" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.crm114 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Paolo <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have learned the hard way that I had forgotten something important > > about 'isolate' and why it is called exactly that ('isolate', and not, > > say, 'instantiate', 'declare' or 'allocate') > > yeah ;) - note the last ISOLATE: you'd do just that after a MATCH (:: :a:) ... > if you'd like to save :a: and its value. If you redo it, it checks if it's > already there and ISOLATE'd, then skip if yes. Yup, I got that now. Up to now, I hadn't used it in my own code like that, so I still lived with a completely _wrong_ idea of what isolate()'d do (like declaring an int in 'C' - _not_ so!) and didn't get burned until I started running mailreaver on Win32 with a GerH build. Lots of little stuff going completely haywire, in no small part due to _me_ being the bug and different I/O behaviour from Win32. And then there's _still_ some screwup somewhere in there with CRLF vs. LF, that I got to dig up, before UNIX and Win32 output is going to be identical... -- Met vriendelijke groeten / Best regards, Ger Hobbelt -------------------------------------------------- web: http://www.hobbelt.com/ http://www.hebbut.net/ mail: [email protected] mobile: +31-6-11 120 978 -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace