Re: problem with trainin since upgrade to blamethesegfault

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Bill Y <[email protected]> wrote:
>  AAAUGH!!!  OK, that's a bug.
>
>  I want Mailtrainer to run in a separate instance... but in the
>  same "execution environment".
>
>  Hmmm...  I wonder if I can do a bit of fork magic here, and have
>  the forked instance check the FLAGS, and if the user has requested
>  it, re-init the engine and then load a new program, preprocess it,
>  JIT it, and start the new program executing...?
>
>  That would also be a big win for demonization.
>
>  Let me think on this.

Okidoki.

Erm, one thing: 'fork' is not really all that nice for my Win32 port
at the moment (because I'm too lazy to add _that_ particular bit of
support just yet), so I'ld like to ask you if you could think more in
terms of turning mailtrainer into a library-like script, say,
mailtrainlib.crm, which is than 'insert'-ed in the mailreaver.crm and
mailtrainer.crm scripts.
Since mailreaver waits for mailtrainer anyhow, the 'in-line' library
single thread approach is identical in terms of performance to a
fork()ed one.

Just my 2 cents in trying to stay partially lazy ;-)

Ger

>
>     - Bill Yerazunis
>
>



-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten / Best regards,

Ger Hobbelt

--------------------------------------------------
web: http://www.hobbelt.com/
 http://www.hebbut.net/
mail: [email protected]
mobile: +31-6-11 120 978
--------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., 
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone