Re: Another take on self-learning
Paolo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.crm114 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20080811133338.GA28936@localhost> |
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:02:21AM -0400, Bill Yerazunis wrote: > you didn't omit those from your prior art, because otherwise you're > patent application itself is defective." yeah, but it's the patents system that's deadly broken - imho only sane way of doing it these days would (will?) be: http://www.peertopatent.org -- paolo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/