Re: [Fwd: Re: crm114 on 64 bit SuSE]
Thomas Spahni <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.crm114 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote: > !@#$% - hurry means forgot to check the to address / reply-all. This copy is > FYI. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Crm114-general] crm114 on 64 bit SuSE > Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:57:20 +0200 > From: Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt <[email protected]> > Reply-To: [email protected] > Organization: Bermuda Holding > To: Thomas Spahni <[email protected]> > References: > <561cc61d0808110943i55b62399g478d1299dd24134e-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org><Pine.LNX.4.63.0808120941410.1940-B2ynjq0xCDP9s9LAhoKJkg@public.gmane.org> > <20080812084035.GA12011@localhost> (sfid-20080812_104055_952859_68B94AF5) > <Pine.LNX.4.63.0808131819270.9907-B2ynjq0xCDP9s9LAhoKJkg@public.gmane.org> > > Thomas Spahni wrote: > > > > Any ideas why count of messages learned goes up by 2 after learning one > > > > message? I never observed this on 32bit systems. > > > > > > which classifier? all? - I suspect a raw bytes count's biting us ... > > > > I observed this with 'osb unique microgroom' (default). > > > > > > Hmmm... you're using mailtrainer.crm I suppose? (you do if you use > mailreaver.crm; not entirely sure but I think you get to use it as well when > using mailfilter.crm -- this is off the top of my bald spot though) Correct. Using mailreaver.crm which in turn calls mailtrainer.crm for learning. > In that case (and here Ger starts to talk gibberish like the Delphi > Oracle) if _may_ be due to your mailfilter.cf settings which may permit > multiple rounds of training on a single message _when_ a training round > does not cause the subsequent classify to produce a sufficiently large > pR value (training threshold). The Delphi Oracle may be right. On one occasion I observed that learning 3 messages resulted in the counter advanced by 5, i.e. 2+2+1 > Don't know the names of those two config parameters in there by head, > but you should be looking for a threshold that's probably still at 10.0 > (while classification thresholds are now two, both I believe are at 5.0 > these days) and at least one more parameter which permits > mailtrainer.crm to loop the train+recheck classification in there. If > you need help with this, please kick me after the weekend again; bit > busy with an (unrelated) deadline I have to make by the end of this week > and it's a bit of a crunch there. I've set the thresholds to +/- 5.0 now but it behaves still the same. Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/