Re: I need a critique: using crm114 to train on (very) limited word set - or are there better ways?
Fidelis Assis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.crm114 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bill Yerazunis escreveu: > (speaking of which, Fidelis: What's the _currrent_ BEST > coefficients and formula for the best-behaving EDDC so far?) I'm using that on page 8 of the EDDC slides with two changes: - Swap "1" and "K3" in the denominator of the second term (a mistake in the slides); - Multiply the whole formula by a new factor starting at 0.8 and growing up to 1 as the number of learnings increase. This reduces initial instability: cfx = 0.8 + (spam_learnings + ham_learnings)/20; if (cfx > 1) cfx = 1.0; The constants are: K1 = 0.25, K2 = 12, K3 = 8; > > Now, CRM114 does not directly output these values; OSBF calculates > EDDC internally, uses them, and then discards them. > Yes, you can only see them in trace mode (-T). -- Fidelis ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/