Re: Question for email gurus: email threads and CRM114

Paolo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.crm114
Message-ID <20081004200150.GE26719@localhost>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:47:06PM +0200, Ger Hobbelt wrote:
> I thought email threads were 'tracked' by email readers using the

point has been extensively addressed time ago when the sfid idea went
into mainline. Basically, MUAs _should_ keep all *_id: and references:
fields intact, _must_ ignore (comments) for msg relations (threading,
ordering, etc), _must_ not alter the true data (ie purging comments 
is still allowed), except for appending new data (IDs) where allowed.

Situation varies a lot between MUAs in use. So the sfid trick might 
_not_ work in some case (that's why IMAP, server-side classification 
is far more robustand replicable).

> Does anyone have production site experience with this (I'm talking
> multi-user setups here, where you'd actually have a help desk to
> harrass when you are Mr. User)

That said, I'm not a mail-guru, that's Fidelis: iirc he's deplyed his
sfid in a system with a fairly large userbase.

-- 
paolo

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.