Re: Any way to tell what features contributed the most for a particular decision?
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.crm114 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks! That's what I was afraid of. I was hoping that I could get something out of the Bayesean/Markov ones. The challenge is, when using this for a client, they'd like to see reports of the most significant features. I may try to build a "debug" data structure for the hyperspace classifier that holds more information. Well, if you want to hack, sure. It's not too bad for Markov/OSB because those operate with a one-token-at-a-time pipeline. However, the hyperspace system works on a phase basis- first the whole text is turned into features, then and only then are the features checked for significance. You'd need to carry a lot of baggage across that divide.... and even then, it would be _wrong_ because in hyperspace, the individual features are nearly meaningless! The meaning is in the confluence of large numbers of features (specificially in the inverse-luminance calculation. So, if they ask you for what was significant in hyperspace, show them the high-scoring example texts, because _those_ truly are the significant elements (and NOT the individual words or phrases within those texts). - Bill Yerazunis ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/