Re: circumflex/caret
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.crm114 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thomas Michael Hagen wrote: > i just ran into a weird problem. > > a regex that i wrote on a 32-bit machine suddenly stopped working when > i ran it on a 64-bit machine. > > the regex: /^[[:lower:]][[:lower:]]\n/ > > it is used in a syscall to ls > > with the caret removed, the regex behaves identically (wrongly) on > both machines (it matches the last two letters of all the subfolders > in the folder) > > with the caret, it works perfectly on the 32-bit machine (it matches > all the subfolders with two-letter names in the folder. > > on the 64-bit machine, however, it doesn't match anything. > > is this a known problem? There's a big rewrite for 64-bit compatibility going on right now. Ger Hebbut's fork may work better for you right now. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H