Re: Prob_Good/Prob_Spam
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:22:57 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.crm114 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jeff Grossman wrote: > I have just started using CRM114 through SpamAssassin through Amavis. > When CRM114 classifies a mail as prob_good or prob_spam, should I > retrain it through mailreaver? Should I retrain any mail that does not > say good or spam? retraining is somewhat controversial. Some people have a magic touch. Others, like me, cause CRM 114 to crap all over the uncertainty zone. It's repeatable and it sucks. I'm beginning to see some wisdom in not performing any incremental training but keeping a history and retraining in bulk every 24 to 48 hours. This is one of those moments where I wish I had the time and energy to do the graphing again because, it shows up in the scores with only five days training and it's not pretty. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects