Re: mailreaver "--undo" ambiguity

Q:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Paul Fox<[email protected]> wrote:
> hi --
>
> the CRM...HOWTO.txt file says:
>
>     --undo     To the extent possible, undo a training with this
>                text (cached will be used if possible).  --undo
>                requires either --spam or --good as well.
>
>
> it's not clear to me which of --spam or --good i should include
> on the commandline.  should it be the way the message _was_ trained,
> or the way it _should_ have been trained?

A:
Better ever than never? ;-)

Anyway, it's the '_was_' variant. --undo basically is a <refute>
operation and to have it mimic an undo it should be applied to the
same db/collection as the previous training-to-be-undone.

Note that you won't get a 'perfect' undo (unless a series of
particular conditions are met). Hence, in actual practice, it's an
/approximation/ of an undo.



-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten / Best regards,

Ger Hobbelt

--------------------------------------------------
web:    http://www.hobbelt.com/
        http://www.hebbut.net/
mail:   [email protected]
mobile: +31-6-11 120 978
--------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------