Re: Bug#554172: crm114: doesn't appear to classify some mails correctly after learning
[email protected] (Bill Yerazunis) Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:47:06 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.crm114 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20091109184706.61BD53DE388@starbuck> |
From: Martin Steigerwald <[email protected]> Am Montag 09 November 2009 schrieb Milan Zamazal: > Do I understand the results of the discussion on the crm114 mailing > list right that the bug can be closed in Debian? I am not sure, Milan! If a good treshold should stay at +10, then probably= =20 yes. But maybe then its would be good a add a hint to README.Debian that=20 for ham/spam mail filtering +5 might be a better choice. What do you think, Bill? I agree. Add the hint. Or even add it to the kit. I thought I had it in the defaults already. The spam techniques have changed in the five years that the initial recommendations were written. OSB still works well, but the knobs need to be set slightly differently. - Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july