RE: Website link for 38.160.176.2

HI Alexey, I did the test again and see the result below and don't see any
hardware problems?

MX-VERIFY-CGI run for ``icic.org''


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Doing resolver lookup for T=MX domain=``icic.org''

DNS yields following MX entries 
  icic.org  (1620s) IN MX  10 mail.icic.org


Only one MX record... 
Well, no backups, but as all systems are looking for MX record in every
case, not bad..



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Testing MX server: mail.icic.org
Address lookup did yield following ones: 


  IPv4 38.160.176.2


Testing server at address: IPv4 38.160.176.2
[ CONNECTED! ]


 220 ICIC_2004.icic.bos Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 5.0.2195.6713
ready at  Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:56:59 -0400 
 EHLO vger.kernel.org
 250-ICIC_2004.icic.bos Hello [209.132.176.167]
 250-TURN
 250-ATRN
 250-SIZE
 250-ETRN
 250-PIPELINING
 250-DSN
 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
 250-8bitmime
 250-BINARYMIME
 250-CHUNKING
 250-VRFY
 250-X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN
 250-X-EXPS=LOGIN
 250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN
 250-AUTH=LOGIN
 250-X-LINK2STATE
 250-XEXCH50
 250 OK


Excellent! It speaks ESMTP!

 MAIL FROM:<>
 250 2.1.0 <>....Sender OK


Fine, it accepts NULL return-path as is mandated by RFC 2821 section 6.1

 RSET
 250 2.0.0 Resetting
 MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>
 250 2.1.0 [email protected] OK
 RCPT TO:<[email protected]>
 250 2.1.5 [email protected] 


Apparently OK!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Thanks
najmul 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 2:54 PM
To: Najmul W. Khan
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 38.160.176.2

Hi Najmul,

On 07/09/05 22:38, Najmul W. Khan wrote:

> HI Alexey,
> 
> Thansk for your responds and i follow the links and check the domain 
> and it did not find any errors,

Please read the link again. It does not mention any domains, it describes a
hardware (or, actually, firmware) bug in your network.

> so why we are still on your list?

Because you still deny any e-mail from many modern systems which use
optional extensions of TCP protocol.

Best,
Alexey


> 
> Thanks and please reply to my [email protected] account as well.
> 
> 
> Najmul
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) 
> [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wed 9/7/2005 2:15 PM To:
> [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Najmul W. Khan Subject:
> Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 38.160.176.2
> 
> Hello.  On 07/09/05 21:27, Najmul Khan wrote:  > HI I am consultant 
> for these mail servers and anytime we have requested the > removal it 
> cannot have SMTP connections,  Please read 
> http://dsbl.org/faq-listed#ecn , then locate and fix the buggy piece 
> of network equipment somewhere nearby to you.  and we got off all the 
> listing > except you guys, We had virus and it all remove now. SO 
> please remove us and > let us know what we can do to prevent this in 
> the future.  If you want to avoid viruses, I see the only way: do not 
> use the well-known virus-vulnerable system in servers. There are much 
> more robust platforms with better understanding of what is an 
> executable code and what is a passive data.  Other types of 
> vulnerabilities require more complex defence, and I doubt that you
> find a simple answer in this maillist.  Best, Alexey   > > Thanks > >
> Najmul Khan > Twister Media, Inc. > Making Technology Simple > 
> www.twistermedia.com <http://www.twistermedia.com/> > www.gizby.com 
> <http://www.gizby.com/> > p.1.866.628.2579 > >
>