SV: Website link for 212.242.219.138

Hi again

Sound good... I might a have a "unknown fried" at my ISP :-)
I will try and see if I can get contact to the user at [email protected] 
:-)

Thanks for your help!

Best regards,
Brian Kenneth Nielsen

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sendt: 7. september 2005 21:11
Til: Brian Kenneth Nielsen
Cc: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 212.242.219.138

Hello.

On 07/09/05 23:01, Brian Kenneth Nielsen wrote:

> Hi Alexey
> 
> Thanks for you answer.
> 
> I have tried called my ISP to see if I could get them to change the to
> change the reverse DNS to my domain, but they don't allow that.
> 
> I have postmaster accounts for my main domain: [email protected]
> 
> I can see in the log from the mailserver that you run a test agains my
> server again.. but this time it looks good, with lots of denied access :-)

Correct :-)

> 
> Does this mean that you have startet the removal procedure for me?

No, and I may not do it. Looks like, your ISP have started it today:

2005/Sep/07 11:00:10 UTC      Removal Confirmation Sent EMail address:
[email protected]
Requestor IP: 80.82.98.12
Message Report: 212.242.32.172 accepted message.
Remote host said: 250 2.6.0  <[email protected]> Queued
mail for delivery

> 
> What else should I do?

Check if your ISP will finish the procedure. They can either forward the
mentioned message to you (assuming that they know your e-mail from the
billing database) or confirm it themself.

Alexey


> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Brian Kenneth Nielsen
> 
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sendt: 7. september 2005 20:03
> Til: Brian Kenneth Nielsen
> Cc: [email protected]
> Emne: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 212.242.219.138
> 
> Hi Brian,
> 
> On 07/09/05 21:43, Brian Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hi DSBL
>>
>> 
>>
>>You run a great service here.. unfortunately my server has been registred
> 
> in
> 
>>your system. As spoken with Paul Howarth and Alexey Lobanov I have now
>>secured my server.
> 
> 
> I hope, yes. Actually, the recipe was simple enough. However, I cannot
> understand why people pay license fee for this sort of software...
> 
> 
>> 
>>
>>As I don't have any of the email addresses listed by your removal system,
> 
> I
> 
>>write to you to test it and remove it if it goes good :-)
> 
> 
> DSBL listing and delisting procedures are asymmetric. A host is listed
> when someone proves a vulnerability in it. A host is delisted when it's
> Postmaster (i.e, you) proves the accountability of it. Means, that there
> is a responsible human reading abuse reports and security alerts being
> sent to standard role addresses.
> 
> 
>>It's because I run
>>the Mail server on an ADSL and the emails you have listed might be in
>>control by my ISP, don't know if any of them exits or is read by a user
> 
> who
> 
>>knows how to handle the mail.
> 
> 
> You can see from this message headers that I also run my home mailserver
> on an ADSL, and it's reverse DNS also points to a generic name in ISP
> domain. Please read http://dsbl.org/faq-listed#notmine for some simple
> ideas: some of those addresses are routed to your server, and it is you
> (The Postmaster) who define which users read it.
> 
> Best,
> Alexey
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>>
>>Best wishes, Brian Kenneth Nielsen
>>
>>Administrator of BKNNet.DK
>>
>> 
>>
>> 
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>