RE: Website link for 208.24.247.131

Peter Knowles <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.dsbl.admin
Message-ID <17BF887F0837D048BF3927F6F8389FE90C3BBD2D@MAIL1>
Alexey:

Thank you for your response.

After some additional investigation, I've learned that the server was indeed
infected with some viruses/malware last month. From what I am told, the
system has been 'cleaned up'. I am auditing the system this weekend.

As far as UNIX is concerned, I do not have the resources (time, money, brain
power, other staff, etc.) to put up another OS, hence relying on your
generosity; I appreciate your help by testing the server.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 1:50 PM
To: Peter Knowles
Cc: '[email protected]'
Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 208.24.247.131

Hi Peter.

On 18/02/06 00:17, Peter Knowles wrote:

> I am an outside consultant for the organization using the above IP for
> email. I do not have access to the admin mailboxes.
> 
> My reason for contacting you is to see whether you can verify whether this
> server still exhibits the vulnerabilities noted within the listing

This specific port 10995 does not reply... and it means nothing.
Uncommon high port numbers are more typical for malware then for
legitimate servers. And malware proxies like to change port numbers in
random way, so it is very normal that this 10995 does not reply now. Was
it malware or a legitimate server? This question must be addressed to
*you*, sir.

> (HTTP-CONNECT, HTTP-PUT). I am told there was some remedial work done on
the
> server since the listing.
> 
> We do not have access to UNIX/LINUX hardware to run any of the testing
> modules offered on your website.

To my knowledge, all modern Unix flavours (even MacOS since last week
;-) are able to run in plain consumer-grade PC hardware. I am not sure
that I understand your difficulties.

> 
> Once I can verify that the server is secure, I will escalate the
responsible
> person in the organization to proceed with the proper de-listing
procedures.
> 
> Thank you for any assistance and input you can provide.

Anyway, according to your request I am running a portscanner (nmap)
against 208.24.247.131 now. The result will be reported, but it may take
from one to dozens hours, depending upon your firewall settings.

Alexey
DSBL volunteer


> 
> Peter Knowles
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.