RE: Website link for 207.173.187.220
"Leisher, Doug" <[email protected]> Tue, 5 Dec 2006 12:30:10 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.dsbl.admin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bert, I did a search on my email server for all messages going to my postmaster (either as a recipient or sender) account. There were none from dsbl.org. Other than waiting the week to do this removal process again, is there anyway I can expedite this? Doug -----Original Message----- From: Bert Driehuis [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 2:28 PM To: Leisher, Doug Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 207.173.187.220 [ Note: I do not represent DSBL. I just track [email protected] to keep abreast of possible issues that might affect my use of DSBL, and occasionally I help out with questions. You may get responses from other subscribers to [email protected], possibly even with dissenting opinions. ] On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Leisher, Doug wrote: > Thanks for your input Bert. I used the ORDB.org site to test for open > relays as I've heard that's pretty good. ORDB is a very good service. Unfortunately, the way it operates means that it is extremely conservative, which results in at least half the open relays and almost all open proxies flying under ORDB's radar. That's not a criticism of ORDB; their conservatism makes them acceptable to a different audience than DSBL's typical large-site postmasters. > I was able to send an email to my postmaster account via an outside > email address. I then saw that in my postmaster inbox and was able to > open it and reply to it. So, if DSBL did send a message to my > postmaster account, I don't know why it appears to be held up. I also > looked at my exchange queues and there aren't any for dsbl.org. If my > postmaster account would have received such a message and then replied > to it, there would be an exchange queue for its delivery. I can't look into your system, and neither can I see more of DSBL's than you can, but in my experience, when the listing page says it was delivered, it was delivered. Most commonly, when message disappear, they get deleted by a misguided spam filter. Many authors of anti-spam tools wilfully disregard an important invariant underlying e-mail delivery: one should either reject, or accept and deliver, a message (that delivery can be to a quaranteen folder, that's okay; deleting it isn't). Your logs really should allow you to find out what happened.