RE: [SPAM] - Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 24.249.105.34 - Found word(s) to be removed list error remove list in the Text body

Thank you for your reply.

There is nothing accountable for trying to alleviate my end users of the
barrage of spam inundating the Internet daily. Because my Spam filtering
program doesn't have a provision to circumvent filtering for a
particular address or addresses is not justification to be hampered by
anyone's list.

As far as recipients needing to add us to their white lists, yes they
can do that, but since we deal with a number of new people every day
that is not only impractical but unnecessary since our server is no
longer an open relay and should not be on "any" restrictive lists.

Thanks again for your response, and insight.

Andrew Bustraan
Network Coordinator
Law/Kingdon, Inc.
345 Riverview Suite 200
Wichita, KS 67203
PH: 316-268-0230
FX: 316-268-0205

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 9:00 AM
To: Andrew Bustraan
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [SPAM] - Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 24.249.105.34 -
Found word(s) to be removed list error remove list in the Text body

Hello.

On 07/12/06 17:38, Andrew Bustraan wrote:

> In a continued effort to be removed from this black list, I was able 
> to determine that the email address that should be added to 
> everyone's whitelist process is [email protected]. I managed to find 
> the following entry in my spam filtering log under keywords:
> 
> 
> 
> "11/29/06 15:48:50","Anti-Spam Keyword 
> Checking","[email protected]","[email protected]","Removal 
> Confirmation for 24.249.105.34","Deleted","Found word(s) remove list 
> in the Text body"
> 
> 
> 
> I however could not find an entry for my resubmission yesterday.
> 
> 
> 
> Nor could I find the email in any other logs, or mailboxes, spam 
> folders, or even when checking a mail monitoring program checking the
>  email at the door to see if it's being returned for bad address or 
> because of a relay attempt.
> 
> 
> 
> Please help me get off your list. I have fixed my problems, and I am 
> not considered an open relay by any other blacklist services besides 
> yours.

DSBL does not say that your host is an open relay now.

Instead, DSBL says that your host is still unaccountable now, because
you are unable to receive reports and alerts related to your server
activity in Internet. And you are explaining above how you are making
your system unaccountable. Intentionally, as far as I understand this
evidence:

> "11/29/06 15:48:50","Anti-Spam Keyword 
> Checking","[email protected]","[email protected]","Removal 
> Confirmation for 24.249.105.34","Deleted","Found word(s) remove list 
> in the Text body"

All this is enough for DSBL users to deny mail from your
"send-only" system which operates out of proper human control.

> Yours is hampering my companies' ability to conduct business.

Please address this issue to your business partners who agree DSBL
criteria and do not want to receive mail from your system. It is quite
possible that they will whitelist your system as a legitimate mail
source.

Alexey
DSBL volunteer


> 
> 
> 
> Andrew Bustraan
> 
> Network Coordinator
> 
> Law/Kingdon, Inc.
> 
> 345 Riverview Suite 200
> 
> Wichita, KS 67203
> 
> PH: 316-268-0230
> 
> FX: 316-268-0205
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This email is confidential and may contain privileged information 
> intended only for the person(s) or entity to whom it is addressed. If
>  the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
> hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that
>  any review, dissemination, use, distribution, copying and/or 
> disclosure in parts or whole of this email and/or the attachments in 
> any form by any means is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
> this email in error, please notify Andrew Bustraan by a reply email 
> or call (316) 268 0230 and remove this email and all related material
>  from your digital infra structure.
> 
>