Re: Website link for 196.37.169.10

Hello.

On 18/12/06 12:22, [email protected] wrote:

> I checked and double checked,there was most definitely no messages from
> you or any DSBL address.Please stop being sarcastic and lets get the
> issue resolved.

Well, now I understand that you had not received the first message.

The message "Return-path" is not very informative, because it is empty.
The test messages are originated from a dumb robot, and this robot
should not receive any delivery reports.

The sufficient starting points for message tracking are provided at
http://dsbl.org/listing?196.37.169.10. The exact time (2006/Dec/11
07:13:07 UTC) and the queue-ID assigned by your mailserver (0DAB02C00ED).

> Do you want me to lodge another IP release to get the
> process going again and are you going to tell me what mail address to
> look out for or supply me with your phone number and international
> code.I am willing to phone you to better explain the situation to you. 

Sorry, no. For two reasons. First, I have no time for phone talks.
Second, DSBL believes that all communications must be recorded for
public audit.

Alexey


> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: 18 December 2006 11:05 AM
> To: Administrator
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10
> 
> Hello Harold.
> 
> On 18/12/06 11:49, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>> Please inform me from whom the initial mail was sent as I can then log
>> on to our service provider firewall to look for the mail in question.
>> How
>> can I respond to mail if I do not know from who or where the mail came
>> from in the first place.
> 
> I repeat that the message contains plain English instruction related to
> DSBL. And I assume that you follow basic e-mail standards and look
> through all mail for your Postmaster and Abuse addresses. So, it will be
> easy for you to recognize this message on your screen - same as you
> recognize messages from me and answer me now.
> 
>> That in itself is a security breach.
> 
> You needn't "respond" this mail. You have to read it and use HTTP URL in
> it. However, this detail is not very important.
> 
> Alexey
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]] 
>> Sent: 18 December 2006 10:05 AM
>> To: Administrator
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 18/12/06 10:55, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there,from whom would the mail have been generated as I for
>> security
>>> reasons do not open mail from just anybody.
>> Please meditate on RFC 2821, Section 4.5.1 (Minimum Implementation):
>>
>> "SMTP systems are expected to make every reasonable effort to accept
>> mail directed to Postmaster from any other system on the Internet."
>>
>>> Please understand this as
>>> South African domains gets hit by viruses on a daily basis.
>> Please be informed that there are quite many production operating
>> systems and mail reading programs not vulnerable to so-called
> "viruses".
>> Noone enforces you to use known virus-vulnerable systems and
> application
>> programs at your administrative workplace.
>>
>> Alexey
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> harold
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]] 
>>> Sent: 18 December 2006 09:18 AM
>>> To: Support
>>> Cc: [email protected]; Administrator
>>> Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10
>>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> On 18/12/06 09:49, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please remove IP 196.37.169.10 from your blocking list as all
>> problems
>>>> have been resolved. i have requested this to be done 7 days ago and
>> it
>>>> is still listed
>>> Yes, because the request has died unfinished at your side. It is not
>>> very interesting for DSBL that your mailserver accepts messages for
>>> <[email protected]>; DSBL wants to know if someone really reads
>>> the messages.
>>>
>>> Please:
>>>
>>> 1. Investigate what had hapened with the previous message and why
>> noone
>>> have read it. The message contained a trivial instruction in plain
>>> English.
>>>
>>> 2. Start new delisting procedure and finish it in accordance with the
>>> test message content.
>>>
>>> Alexey
>>> DSBL volunteer
>>>
>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Harold Fouche
>>>>
>>>> Network administrator
>>>>
>>>> Paracon Holdings(for Kathea Communication Solutions)
>>>>
>>>> South Africa
>>>>
>>>> +27829223147
>>>>
>>>>