RE: RE: Website link for 196.37.169.10

Hi there,I checked with my service provider and they confirmed that the
mail was delivered.I hereby respectfully request that you resend the
removal instructions and will ensure that this mail will not get
lost,deleted or undelivered.

Keep up the good work

Regards.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Eudes ONFRAY [mailto:[email protected]]=20
Sent: 18 December 2006 11:46 AM
To: Administrator
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: RE: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10



--- Original Message ---
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10
> Date: Mon 18 Dec 2006 10:22:25 CET
>=20
> I checked and double checked,there was most definitely no messages
from
> you or any DSBL address.Please stop being sarcastic and lets get the
> issue resolved.Do you want me to lodge another IP release to get the
> process going again and are you going to tell me what mail address to
> look out for or supply me with your phone number and international
> code.I am willing to phone you to better explain the situation to you.

>=20

Hi,

All these  informations are available on
http://dsbl.org/listing?196.37.169.10
The removal message was delivered to 196.37.246.24 _Your_ server replyed
"250
Ok: queued as 0DAB02C00ED" You should find this message ID 0DAB02C00ED
in your
server logs.
As per RFC1123 section 5.2.9 the removal message was sent with an empty
reverse
path. Please read http://dsbl.org/rfcinfo for more informations.

Regards,

Jean-Eudes
DSBL Volunteer


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]]=20
> Sent: 18 December 2006 11:05 AM
> To: Administrator
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10
>=20
> Hello Harold.
>=20
> On 18/12/06 11:49, [email protected] wrote:
>=20
> > Please inform me from whom the initial mail was sent as I can then
log
> > on to our service provider firewall to look for the mail in
question.
> > How
> > can I respond to mail if I do not know from who or where the mail
came
> > from in the first place.
>=20
> I repeat that the message contains plain English instruction related
to
> DSBL. And I assume that you follow basic e-mail standards and look
> through all mail for your Postmaster and Abuse addresses. So, it will
be
> easy for you to recognize this message on your screen - same as you
> recognize messages from me and answer me now.
>=20
> > That in itself is a security breach.
>=20
> You needn't "respond" this mail. You have to read it and use HTTP URL
in
> it. However, this detail is not very important.
>=20
> Alexey
>=20
> >=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]]=20
> > Sent: 18 December 2006 10:05 AM
> > To: Administrator
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10
> >=20
> > Hello.
> >=20
> > On 18/12/06 10:55, [email protected] wrote:
> >=20
> >> Hi there,from whom would the mail have been generated as I for
> > security
> >> reasons do not open mail from just anybody.
> >=20
> > Please meditate on RFC 2821, Section 4.5.1 (Minimum Implementation):
> >=20
> > "SMTP systems are expected to make every reasonable effort to accept
> > mail directed to Postmaster from any other system on the Internet."
> >=20
> >> Please understand this as
> >> South African domains gets hit by viruses on a daily basis.
> >=20
> > Please be informed that there are quite many production operating
> > systems and mail reading programs not vulnerable to so-called
> "viruses".
> > Noone enforces you to use known virus-vulnerable systems and
> application
> > programs at your administrative workplace.
> >=20
> > Alexey
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >> Thanks
> >> harold
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]]=20
> >> Sent: 18 December 2006 09:18 AM
> >> To: Support
> >> Cc: [email protected]; Administrator
> >> Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10
> >>
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> On 18/12/06 09:49, [email protected] wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please remove IP 196.37.169.10 from your blocking list as all
> > problems
> >>> have been resolved. i have requested this to be done 7 days ago
and
> > it
> >>> is still listed
> >> Yes, because the request has died unfinished at your side. It is
not
> >> very interesting for DSBL that your mailserver accepts messages for
> >> <[email protected]>; DSBL wants to know if someone really
reads
> >> the messages.
> >>
> >> Please:
> >>
> >> 1. Investigate what had hapened with the previous message and why
> > noone
> >> have read it. The message contained a trivial instruction in plain
> >> English.
> >>
> >> 2. Start new delisting procedure and finish it in accordance with
the
> >> test message content.
> >>
> >> Alexey
> >> DSBL volunteer
> >>
> >>
> >>> =20
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>> =20
> >>>
> >>> Harold Fouche
> >>>
> >>> Network administrator
> >>>
> >>> Paracon Holdings(for Kathea Communication Solutions)
> >>>
> >>> South Africa
> >>>
> >>> +27829223147
> >>>
> >>>
>=20