Re: Website link for 81.99.84.37

Hello Raj.

28.12.2006 16:36, Administrator пишет:

> Hi Alexey,
> 
> Thanks so much for your reply.
> 
> I got in touch with NTL and I think its useless

Yes, this problem is known already to the Internet community.
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=ntl.com

By the way, this record may be an additional reason of your mail
delivery problems while your reverse DNS points to NTL instead of your
own corporate domain. So, I strongly advice you to obtain a proper
reverse DNS record from NTL despite of their resistance. BTW2: hosts
with "generic" reverse DNS names without "static" word in it tend to be
interpreted as "dialup" now, http://www.de.sorbs.net/faq/dul.shtml. My
home mailserver has been hit by SORBS last summer despite the IP-address
itself was perfectly static since 2001. The solution was to waive some
part of privacy :-) and order individual rDNS.

> so can you advise on
> any other steps that might sort this out.

Just read manuals, contact Microsoft helpdesk if necessary, and
configure your mailserver for
<[email protected]>. In case of
success you will be able to repeat the delisting procedure on Jan 04.
There is no other, faster way. Sorry.

Alexey

> 
> I would be really greatful.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Raj,
> 
> Administrator
> 
> Business Park Solutions
> 
> Tel : 07871522563
> 
> Email :[email protected]
> 
> www.businessparksolutions.com
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of
> the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
> disclosure under law. If you received this in error, please contact
> the sender and delete the material from any computer.
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thu
> 28/12/2006 10:53 To: Administrator Cc: [email protected];
> [email protected] Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for
> 81.99.84.37
> 
> 
> 
> Hello.
> 
> On 28/12/06 13:31, Administrator wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have recently set up my exchange and in the beginning it was open
>>  relay.
>> 
>> Now I have sorted theses issues.
> 
> Seems to be so. You can see fresh relay tests in your logs - and
> nothing new at http://dsbl.org/listing?81.99.84.37. Very good.
> 
>> I use ntl and as you have asked not to write email to ask removal 
>> from your liste which is fair enough, I wanted to go for the 
>> following procedure:
>> 
>> 
>> The removal addresses do not point to my domain!
> 
> So, you have read the FAQ entry. Good.
> 
>> If addresses like #1 and #3 above do not appear, it means that the 
>> reverse DNS points to a hostname (A record) that does not exist. 
>> Without a matching A record, no mail can be delivered to the
>> hostname specified in reverse DNS.
> 
> Not an issue, because the DNS records are intact:
> 
> aal@mail:~$ host 81.99.84.37 37.84.99.81.in-addr.arpa domain name
> pointer cpc1-glen2-0-0-cust36.belf.cable.ntl.com.
> 
> aal@mail:~$ host cpc1-glen2-0-0-cust36.belf.cable.ntl.com 
> cpc1-glen2-0-0-cust36.belf.cable.ntl.com has address 81.99.84.37
> 
>> Could you provide me with further details on how to go forward with
>>  this.
> 
>> I am on exchange 2003 and using windows 2003 for the domain 
>> controller.
> 
> To my knowledge, noone in DSBL team uses any MS products in servers.
> The practical advices are:
> 
> 1. Read your software manuals.
> 
> 2. http://support.microsoft.com/
> 
> 3. http://www.msexchange.org/
> 
>> Hoping to hear from you shortly.
> 
> Anyway, you will be able to do something next week only, when the
> test message to <[email protected]> will expire. Or, possibly, you
> will convince NTL people to find the message in question and forward
> it to you.
> 
> Alexey DSBL volunteer
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Happy new year.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> 
>> Raj,
>> 
>> Administrator
>> 
>> Business Park Solutions
>> 
>> Tel : 07871522563
>> 
>> Email :[email protected]
>> 
>> www.businessparksolutions.com
>> 
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use
>> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may
>> contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt
>> from disclosure under law. If you received this in error, please
>> contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
>