Re: 216.37.20.20
Alexey Lobanov <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Dec 2006 04:24:24 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.dsbl.admin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello. 29.12.2006 4:08, Leah Peters пишет: > Can you tell me what email address you sent the Removal request from? From: DSBL <[email protected]> The Return-Path was empty, in accordance with RFC 1123/STD 3, Section 5.2.9. The sending script is a dumb robot and it is not able to receive and process any delivery or non-delivery reports. > Our ISP is not able to find the email you sent to [email protected] so > they cannot respond back to it. "250 ok 1167320663 qp 6148 server-12.tower-55.messagelabs.com!1167320663!76661093!1" string must be absolutely enough for message tracking. This record contains unique "Queue-ID" assigned by the receiving mailserver. Alexey > > Leah J. Peters > > > > -----Original Message----- From: Alexey Lobanov > [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 8:10 PM > To: Leah Peters Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] > 216.37.20.20 > > Hello. > > 29.12.2006 3:55, Leah Peters пишет: > >> IF we find an Info and/or Admin account in our SAM (which as of >> yet, we have not) > > This idea about local SAM was a guess only. I don't know and I may > not know how does your internal authentification system works. > >> and delete or change the passwords, can you remove us from the >> list? > > No, because DSBL cannot check it. The ONLY delisting criteria is > "accountability": you have to prove that you are able to receive and > read your "postmaster" (or "abuse") mail. In theory, you may even not > to fix passwords, but in this case your server will be nearly > instantly listed back. > > Alexey > >> Leah J. Peters >> >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Alexey Lobanov >> [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 7:43 >> PM To: Leah Peters Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] >> 216.37.20.20 >> >> Hello. >> >> 29.12.2006 3:28, Leah Peters пишет: >> >>> Since the vulnerabilities are happening on accounts that I do NOT >>> run on my network, >> How it looks from the sender side: >> >> Connecting to 216.37.20.20... done. <<< 220 ********************** >>>>> EHLO lobanov.sp.ru >> <<< 250-mailfilter2003.TIG.local <<< 250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN <<< >> 250 XA >>>>> AUTH LOGIN >> <<< 334 VXNlcm5hbWU6 >>>>> aW5mbw== >> <<< 334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6 >>>>> aW5mbw== >> <<< 235 2.7.0 Authentication successful. >>>>> MAIL FROM:<[email protected]> >> <<< 250 2.1.0 [email protected] OK >>>>> RCPT TO:<[email protected]> >> <<< 250 2.1.5 [email protected] >>>>> DATA >> <<< 354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF> >>>>> (message) >> <<< 250 2.6.0 <[email protected]> >> Queued mail for delivery >>>>> QUIT >> <<< 221 2.0.0 tobiasemail.TIG.local Service closing transmission >> channel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- Server >> accepted message AUTH=login USER=info PASS=<censored> >> IP=216.37.20.20 >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> So, your server definitely knows "info". A standard reason is local >> accounts: you have no this "info" in the domain, but you have it >> in the local SAM at mailfilter2003.TIG.local. Please check. >> >>> you are clearly making business decisions for my company. >> No, we are telling you new important details about your corporate >> computer system features and it's public activity in Internet. >> >> Alexey >> >>> Leah J. Peters >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Alexey Lobanov >>> [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 7:32 >>> PM To: Leah Peters Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: >>> [DSBL-Contact] 216.37.20.20 >>> >>> Hello Leah. >>> >>> 29.12.2006 3:17, Leah Peters пишет: >>> >>>> Alexey, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> One question, do YOU have the capability of removing my IP from >>>> the list? >>> I have neither capability nor wish. Your server is a proved and >>> active open relay, and DSBL users (your recipients) may and >>> should know this impleasant fact until you fix the vulnerability >>> and prove that your Postmaster mail is really able to receive >>> alerts and reports. >>> >>> Alexey >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >