Re: 216.37.20.20

Alexey Lobanov <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Dec 2006 04:24:24 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.dsbl.admin
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello.

29.12.2006 4:08, Leah Peters пишет:

> Can you tell me what email address you sent the Removal request from?

From: DSBL <[email protected]>

The Return-Path was empty, in accordance with RFC 1123/STD 3, Section
5.2.9. The sending script is a dumb robot and it is not able to receive
and process any delivery or non-delivery reports.

> Our ISP is not able to find the email you sent to [email protected] so
> they cannot respond back to it.

"250 ok 1167320663 qp 6148
server-12.tower-55.messagelabs.com!1167320663!76661093!1" string must be
absolutely enough for message tracking. This record contains unique
"Queue-ID" assigned by the receiving mailserver.

Alexey



> 
> Leah J. Peters
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Alexey Lobanov
> [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 8:10 PM 
> To: Leah Peters Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact]
> 216.37.20.20
> 
> Hello.
> 
> 29.12.2006 3:55, Leah Peters пишет:
> 
>> IF we find an Info and/or Admin account in our SAM (which as of
>> yet, we have not)
> 
> This idea about local SAM was a guess only. I don't know and I may
> not know how does your internal authentification system works.
> 
>> and delete or change the passwords, can you remove us from the
>> list?
> 
> No, because DSBL cannot check it. The ONLY delisting criteria is 
> "accountability": you have to prove that you are able to receive and 
> read your "postmaster" (or "abuse") mail. In theory, you may even not
> to fix passwords, but in this case your server will be nearly
> instantly listed back.
> 
> Alexey
> 
>> Leah J. Peters
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Alexey Lobanov 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 7:43
>> PM To: Leah Peters Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] 
>> 216.37.20.20
>> 
>> Hello.
>> 
>> 29.12.2006 3:28, Leah Peters пишет:
>> 
>>> Since the vulnerabilities are happening on accounts that I do NOT
>>>  run on my network,
>> How it looks from the sender side:
>> 
>> Connecting to 216.37.20.20... done. <<< 220 **********************
>>>>> EHLO lobanov.sp.ru
>> <<< 250-mailfilter2003.TIG.local <<< 250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN <<<
>>  250 XA
>>>>> AUTH LOGIN
>> <<< 334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
>>>>> aW5mbw==
>> <<< 334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6
>>>>> aW5mbw==
>> <<< 235 2.7.0 Authentication successful.
>>>>> MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>
>> <<< 250 2.1.0 [email protected] OK
>>>>> RCPT TO:<[email protected]>
>> <<< 250 2.1.5 [email protected]
>>>>> DATA
>> <<< 354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
>>>>> (message)
>> <<< 250 2.6.0  <[email protected]> 
>> Queued mail for delivery
>>>>> QUIT
>> <<< 221 2.0.0 tobiasemail.TIG.local Service closing transmission 
>> channel
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------- Server 
>> accepted message AUTH=login USER=info PASS=<censored>
>> IP=216.37.20.20 
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> So, your server definitely knows "info". A standard reason is local
>>  accounts: you have no this "info" in the domain, but you have it
>> in the local SAM at mailfilter2003.TIG.local. Please check.
>> 
>>> you are clearly making business decisions for my company.
>> No, we are telling you new important details about your corporate 
>> computer system features and it's public activity in Internet.
>> 
>> Alexey
>> 
>>> Leah J. Peters
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Alexey Lobanov 
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 7:32
>>>  PM To: Leah Peters Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re:
>>> [DSBL-Contact] 216.37.20.20
>>> 
>>> Hello Leah.
>>> 
>>> 29.12.2006 3:17, Leah Peters пишет:
>>> 
>>>> Alexey,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> One question, do YOU have the capability of removing my IP from
>>>>  the list?
>>> I have neither capability nor wish. Your server is a proved and 
>>> active open relay, and DSBL users (your recipients) may and
>>> should know this impleasant fact until you fix the vulnerability
>>> and prove that your Postmaster mail is really able to receive
>>> alerts and reports.
>>> 
>>> Alexey
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>