Re: Re: Port 10099?

Jacek Zapala <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:03:54 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.dsbl.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
* Dick Wesseling ([email protected]) [050317 18:27] wrote:
> 
> > This morning a received a substantial batch of pump'n'dump scam spams
> > from a variety of what I presumed were open proxies. However, most of
> > them didn't seem to have any open proxies there. One thing that appeared
> > very commonly though was an open port 10099, though it consistently
> > refuses proxy connections:
> >
> > ..
> > Any idea what this might be?
> 
> 
> This has been going on for a couple of weeks. about 5% of all spam
> sources has this port and 0% is an open proxy (tested a few K).
> 
> There is more going on, have a look at http://www.fi.uu.nl/~ftu/score.gif
> this shows the percentage of open proxies found by my scanner over
> the last 500 days. Notice the sharp drop that occurred a few weeks
> ago.

There is a lot of spam coming from machines behind a NAT. They have to
connect to some sort of servers to get jobs to do. Maybe you are
observing these servers...

        Jacek


----------------------------------------------
This message was sent to the opt-in DSBL list.
If you do not want to receive DSBL messages,
please send mail to [email protected].