Re: Re: up-to-date list of most common ports
Dick Wesseling <[email protected]> Sun, 22 May 2005 18:14:49 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.dsbl.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] said: > I've seen your email but for some reason didn't reply at that time, Same here, but for another reason. I intent to publish a portlist one of these days, but that will take some time. I now get around the ACL problem by using a distributed scanner. but that means that my logs are now scattered across a few locations and I will have to do some hacking to merge them. I did not want to make an announcement until I had it working, but now that the subject has been brought up: expect to hear something from me some time next week. > Because noone wants to perform full portscans of all suspect hosts, > and because most proxies nowadays uses really random ports. I don't the resources to scan *all* suspect hosts, but a few thousand per day is enough to pick new trends. Here is my current shortlist: s4:10099 (ACL!) s5:8012 s4:559 s4:1080 ho:6588 hc:63000 s4:32167 s4:10777 (ACL!) s5:1098 s5:8015 s4:40053 s5:8020 Most of these are familiar, but there are a few newcomers. > but I too don't pefrorm full protscans (and never did, because we're > paying per traffic) I found a pot of gold at the end of the bandwidth rainbow. ---------------------------------------------- This message was sent to the opt-in DSBL list. If you do not want to receive DSBL messages, please send mail to [email protected].