Re: Testing Servers?

Wow. It's either really easy to piss you off, or you
just like being nasty.

We all know how insecure IE is.  But how does
blacklisting my MTA serve to fix an IE problem?  By
punishing those who would use your sofware at
firestuff.org to help secure their sites?  (I'm a
long-time messagewall user)

My original point was just this:  Why would DSBL doing
it's own testing be more controversial than the owner
of dsbl.org doing automatic testing on every visitor
to his website?

And it's not like I was trying to have this discussion
out in public - but dsbl.org only lists two contact
addresses, admin and list.  Admin wouldn't work unless
I told it what IP address I was talking about.

--- Ian Gulliver <[email protected]>
wrote:

> > I would submit that a trusted test automatically
> > generated from a website hit to a domain owned by
> the
> > same person as dsbl.org could also be considered
> > controversial.  Visiting one of Ian's websites
> > generates an automated trusted test of the
> visiting IP
> > address.
> 
> So, you requested a webpage, got the answer back,
> and are complaining
> that it contained code that you didn't like?  My
> system never initiated
> a connection to you; I suggest you get a better web
> browser and get over
> it.
> 
> -- 
> Ian Gulliver
> Penguin Hosting
> "Failure is not an option; it comes bundled with
> your Microsoft products."
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

----------------------------------------------
This message was sent to the opt-in DSBL list.
If you do not want to receive DSBL messages,
please send mail to [email protected].