Re: Re: ny enterprises using greylisting on Sendmail / Postfix?
Ronald Oussoren <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.greylist.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7-sep-2005, at 6:07, Philip Kizer wrote: > "Bob de Wildt" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> At this moment we have all our MX servers deployed with relay delay. >> Though we use 3 different databases to keep track of the triplets. >> > > We have multiple MX hosts as well (that are actually load- > balanced), but a > single mysql backend for all. I've rolled back a greylisting setup with Postfix (and postgrey as the greylisting service) due to some mail that got lost. On several occassions we had complaints from users that mail didn't get through without any feedback to the sender of the mail, all of those turned out to be MTAs that didn't behave in an RFC compliant way. I'm actually contemplating to restore greylisting because it is a very effective way to block spam. I won't do that until I've either found a greylisting solution for Postfix with better reporting, or until I've written a reporting tool for postgrey. Not having reporting tools makes it very hard to find and diagnose problems with greylisting. Ronald