access.db - RELAY vs OK (as well as FRIEND?)
The Dragon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.greylist.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20051127213618.990140@Gwenn> |
Hi, After having used relaydelay-cvs (0.05) for a while - with sendmail - I finally looked a bit closer at the access-db code. And somehow I started to wonder... It appears to me as if the only whitelisted servers are the ones that have a "RELAY" right-hand-side entry in /etc/mail/access. Am I right with that assumption? If so, wouldn't it make more sense to check for "OK" as well as "RELAY"? I mean, I might not like people relaying through me, but they're "OK" enough to send to me. I also thought you'd do the same with whitelisting specific senders in /etc/mail/aliases (I know, not smart if done on a large scale!) - have an lhs of "[email protected]" and an rhs of "OK", and not a "FRIEND" or "HATER" rhs. All of a sudden I feel "mentally challenged" - I doubt myself. So I think my questions are: - would "OK" on the RHS also be something worthwile to check against (and then just blindly accept), and - Where did "FRIEND" / "HATER" come from? Did I sleep through some cool sendmail-access_db change (again?) - And if I didn't snooze, should that test perhaps also be done against the rhs of "OK"? Staring at too much code.... Frank P.S.: Of course I'll email the changes back to the list in patch-format. Anything to get relaydelay-cvs to relaydelay-0.05 :) !