Re: Database performance

Wayne Walker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.greylist.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Offlist Evan prodded me and I realize I mis spoke greatly.

I did add some indexes, but that improved the performance of the
relaydelay.pl milter under heavy inbound mail load rather than 
fixing a problem with the db_maintenance.pl performance.

Although, if one runs db_maintenance.pl daily, the indexing that I did
to improve relaydelay.pl performance is probably not necessary.

Wayne

I added these indexes to fix relaydelay.pl performance:

alter table relaytofrom add index (origin_type);
alter table relaytofrom add index (block_expires);
alter table relaytofrom add index (record_expires);

That dropped my heavy inbound mail load from peaking in the 30s and 40s
to peaking around 5.

But at the time I had over 4 million rows in relaytofrom.  I now have
only 400,000.




On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:27:19AM -0600, Wayne Walker wrote:
> Follow Evan's advice, but also add indexes to the tables.  This greatly
> improved the maintenance script run time for me.
> 
> BE WARNED!  Adding the indexes will slam your mysql server for a LONG
> TIME (I had 4 million rows in each table (maintenance db hadn't been
> run in a long time) and it took about 15 minutes PER INDEX).  
> 
> Once I added the indexes, it still took a long time to run, but the
> system was usable during the maintenance db run (it was NOT usable
> before (load would hit 30's and 40's).
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:05:06PM -0800, Brian Ross wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I was wondering if anyone has any performance tuning tips for the MySQL 
> > db as implemented in relaydelay.
> > 
> > We're running the db_maintenance script regularly, expiring 
> > approximately 1.25 million rows on a nightly basis with the maintenace 
> > taking approximately 1.5 hours.
> > 
> > During the maintenance we're turning off our mail relays because the 
> > maintenance is so disk intensive that it causes relaydelay to slow down 
> > to the point of hitting the milter time out values (yes - I suppose I 
> > could look at altering those in the sendmail.cf).
> > 
> > Any thoughts on optimization would be appreciated.
> > 
> > 
> > -Brian
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > +-------------+--------+------------+----------+----------------+-------------+-----------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+----------------+---------+
> > | Name        | Type   | Row_format | Rows     | Avg_row_length | 
> > Data_length | Max_data_length | Index_length | Data_free | 
> > Auto_increment | Create_time         | Update_time         | 
> > Check_time          | Create_options | Comment |
> > +-------------+--------+------------+----------+----------------+-------------+-----------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+----------------+---------+
> > | dns_name    | MyISAM | Dynamic    | 11463906 |             57 |   
> > 654696476 |      4294967295 |    260299776 |         0 |           NULL 
> > | 2003-07-09 16:00:24 | 2006-01-04 22:44:01 | NULL                
> > |                |         |
> > | mail_log    | MyISAM | Dynamic    |        0 |              0 
> > |           0 |      4294967295 |         1024 |         0 
> > |              1 | 2003-07-09 16:00:24 | 2003-07-09 16:00:24 | 
> > NULL                |                |         |
> > | relayreport | MyISAM | Dynamic    | 21424674 |            118 |  
> > 2535895056 |      4294967295 |    994676736 |         0 |      372929009 
> > | 2003-12-07 01:05:17 | 2006-01-04 21:07:35 | NULL                
> > |                |         |
> > | relaytofrom | MyISAM | Dynamic    |  3248361 |            131 |   
> > 426743244 |      4294967295 |    126875648 |         0 |      372993269 
> > | 2003-07-09 16:00:24 | 2006-01-04 22:44:15 | 2006-01-04 21:34:26 
> > |                |         |
> > +-------------+--------+------------+----------+----------------+-------------+-----------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+----------------+---------+
> > 4 rows in set (0.01 sec)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Greylist-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.puremagic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/greylist-users
> 
> -- 
> 
> Wayne Walker
> 
> www.unwiredbuyer.com - when you just can't be by the computer
> 
> [email protected]                    Do you use Linux?!
> http://www.bybent.com                 Get Counted!  http://counter.li.org/
> Perl - http://www.perl.org/           Perl User Groups - http://www.pm.org/
> Jabber:  [email protected]   AIM:     lwwalkerbybent
> IRC:     wwalker on freenode.net

> _______________________________________________
> Greylist-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.puremagic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/greylist-users


-- 

Wayne Walker

www.unwiredbuyer.com - when you just can't be by the computer

[email protected]                    Do you use Linux?!
http://www.bybent.com                 Get Counted!  http://counter.li.org/
Perl - http://www.perl.org/           Perl User Groups - http://www.pm.org/
Jabber:  [email protected]   AIM:     lwwalkerbybent
IRC:     wwalker on freenode.net
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.