Up and running on the real sever - and I have some questions
Dennis Wynne <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:39:00 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.greylist.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I put the new anti-SPAM server in front of the real server yesterday afternoon and things (to me) are humming right along. One thing I noticed is the SPAMmers don't pick up on the change to the MX records and keep sending a good bit to the old server - while legit servers quickly started using the new server. In a few days if this keeps up I will just block all outside connections to the old server. Between the time I changed the MX records and this morning I got about 20 SPAMs (a really low count for me) and NONE - ZERO - of them came through the new server. I am getting some push-back from some of the users so I have some questions. 1) What timeout period does everyone use? Anyone done a study about the various times? If SPAMmers "never" retry then 5 minutes would be long enough. Do you block more SPAM setting it to around an hour than you do setting it for 5 minutes? Seems like if a SPAM box does any retries at all it will get through and all you are doing is just delaying legit mail. 2) I block all un-known users before relaydelay sees them, so the only "to:" addresses that get looked up and inserted in MySQL are legit users. Any thoughts to changing the scripts to run not against the triplet of from:, to:, and IP to just from: and IP? This makes sense to me, since if I routinely accept messages from [email protected] and I ask him to e-mail a co-worker I would think it would be OK for bob's mail to go through w/o a delay. Ditto for things like CNN news e-mails. Once one of them to any user has been accepted, no need to delay the others if they are all from the same IP - is there? Anyone done this and can share the changes? 3) Does anyone use a bypass method when an e-mail just "has to get through" ? Say a customer has a mail server that never retries, or does not retry for 4 hours and I NEED to let an e-mail though. Should I configure a non-published username that I could let bypass relaydelay and have the mail get through? I know some systems have a "password" you can put in the subject line to bypass their SPAM filters - but that would not work with the greylist. 4) Does anyone have any reporting scripts that they can share? My users would like me to give them a report of any mail that was seen, but not passed (no retires in the allowed time) so they can see if they missed anything. I think I could do these myself, but I am hoping someone already has done some report stuff and will share it. Any other reports would be nice as well - and if there is a way to serve them up HTTP for local users that would be even better. Thanks in advance for your thoughts, Dennis