Re: An approach for reducing mail loss with greylisting
Frank Bax <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:54:26 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.greylist.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 08:49 AM 11/12/06, Gaal Yahas wrote: > How about failing the transaction at the very last moment, after > we get the whole message (assuming there's only one, which is by > far the most common case)? Then, if after X hours we don't see the > same UID again, we *do* deliver the refused message, but mark it as > X-Graylist-Status: Abandoned and leave it to procmail/spamassassn/MUA > to decide the implications. This not even possible is some greylist implementations? On OpenBSD, the packet filter decides if the message goes to spamd (greylisting) or mail (which could be on a separate box). Once an ip address is whitelisted by spamd, further connections go directly to mail bypassing spamd. I think implementing your suggestion would mean adding mail relay code into the spamd code. Also, I've found greylisting an extremely effective filter for virii created email - haven't seen a single one since implementing greylist. You're suggesting we accept all that garbage?