Re: Greylist-users Digest, Vol 53 , Issue 2
Philip Goisman <[email protected]> Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:10:52 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.greylist.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:40:37 +0000 From: "R.Oxley" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Greylist-users] IPs skipping relaydelay To: Greylisting Users and Developers Discussion <[email protected]> have they been whitelisted in your spamdb? what do the log files report for the IPs involved? cheers Rafe No whitelisting and no OK in the accessdb. The only log touched was the maillog. And that showed only one entry for the IPs. I was bitten with DAG's perl-MIME-tools-5.425-1 update which killed mimedefang and my mail server. Although I was without mimedefang for a few days, until I fixed the perl-MIME-tools problem, the update may have affected relaydelay too. Anyhow, I'll watch for repeats of the problem reported below. If I see more action there, I'll get back with the list. Thanks, Philip Philip Goisman wrote: > Hi, > > In the past week I've been experiencing IPs that are not being > challenged by relaydelay. The usual practice is to tempfail an > IP for an hour after which if the sending e-mail server responds > correctly, the e-mail is delivered. > > The system on which greylisting is invoked is a redhat el4 system. > > Most of the time this works. But for a subnet starting with 216.83, > they are getting by the relay check. > > Anyone have any ideas on this? > > Philip