Re: Any benefit to changing the TEMPFAIL message?
"Albert E. Whale" <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:46:42 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.greylist.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | ABS Computer Technology, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dennis Wynne wrote: > I would be worried that changing the tempfail message would alert spammers > that something is up. > > If you have users sending mail directly to your mail user their mail > programs, you would expect, would understand the message failed and needs to > be resent. Otherwise, if they are your users just white list their IPs or > the whole range of IPs they are on and the mail will go through every time. > > As to servers legit servers that never retry, shame on them :-) . Ones we > know never retry or mangle the mail_from with each attempt or use a mail > server "Farm" with various IPs to send and resend the mail we just white > list as well. Our users also know to tell folks that are new contacts just > to send their e-mail, wait a couple of minutes, and send it again. Or if > they don't see an expected e-mail after a bit I have a web page / php script > that lets them search to see if they had any bounces (I didn't write it, > just modified it a little) so they can ask the contact to resend - or they > just ask them to without checking first. > > A small price to pay in hassle compared to the tons of spam we don't let in. > > Dennis > > I am in Total agreement with you Dennis. Thank you. -- Albert E. Whale, CHS CISA CISSP Sr. Security, Network, Risk Assessment and Systems Consultant ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ABS Computer Technology, Inc. <http://www.ABS-CompTech.com> - Email, Internet and Security Consultants SPAMZapper <http://www.Spam-Zapper.com> - No-JunkMail.com <http://www.No-JunkMail.com> - *True Spam Elimination*.