[MS-OXPSVAL]: E-Mail Postmark Validation Protocol Specification
Aaron Toponce <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:16:37 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.hashcash |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Curious if anyone has read over this, and what their thoughts are. This is Microsoft's implementation of a proof-of-work system, similar to Hashcash (I hesitate to call it a "derivative"). http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc433493%28v=3Dexchg.80%29.aspx =46rom what I can tell, the protocol is covered by a royalty-based patent, which will prevent any Free Software implementations. What I find interesting, is the recipients, sender and subject are encoded into a base-64 string. What's the purpose of this? base-64 encoding doesn't add any significant time to the processing, and it's trivial to reverse getting the original data. Anyway, just curious. -- =2E o . o . o . . o o . . . o . =2E . o . o o o . o . o o . . o o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://tinyurl.com/aarongpg iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJN/mc1AAoJEM55Ebf8BAiPCP0IAIc2tMCFB6zfZcqNpQUNFaxm rDqheom0Dhl0KNnBn2C49hWWr+G/kZxm44y+Dv6WvYvB2K47nPzsqr/Ft+NcXFmF jBEgQSNVvd71Y6aIoSJLyKIAwT5dtY5q3CQpKLixrA09vFe5ikUWbM2mDwPwglb8 cZfqPStfmnye8KlbBG/UPOJD7P1ngqVmWJMROVIwSPKxc2U69NqXnXfdEL+K0e1G wIr4pJCH06kEyVi8zEv3/sHuO1rUbsmOtu21mopmtWvSz2dmk6EBUosX1h8rAKJU dzhnkc1K1KNiK/sw3HkjiNIBeCQgpyhgacR2U/qF1vMVG6cGiC5VdCYCT+B0M7U= =qX2z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9--