Re: Exchange mucking with the headers
Aaron Toponce <[email protected]> Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:55:19 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.hashcash |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--gDGSpKKIBgtShtf+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:47:20AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote: > I've come to the knowledge that Exchange is mucking with the mail headers, > stripping out any duplicate fields. This is troublesome for me, as sending > a mail to multiple recipients, means minting many Hashcash tokens, and > placing each token in the header with "X-Hashcash". There may be more than > one present. However, Exchange changes "X-Hashcash" to "x-hashcash", and > removes any dupe "x-hashcash" fields. > > I could stamp each mail upon delivery, rather than mail creation, but that > would meach changing the way I handle SMTP with Mutt, and that's not > something I'm really interested in persuing. AFAIK, there is no "standard" > against duplicate header fields, so my multiple "X-Hashcash" tokens should > be just fine. I guess thinking about this a little further, I could put every token under one "X-Hashcash" field, separated by semicolons, or something similar. Thoughts on this approach? -- . o . o . o . . o o . . . o . . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o --gDGSpKKIBgtShtf+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://tinyurl.com/aarongpg iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJOXktXAAoJEM55Ebf8BAiPmbIH/3rEwA5rAuAjR8j9hcXZ/9zK xaA9Tyihzv3S8mMLaG4x6NQl9gfLG7DQTi1Vl4LliK+s3WdP1OLhBrixj1kNEZ7x rb7fWthWK778ZKX6+sgFhMwSit8c2zKN2O+keL54f/1BpEL6UU6RI4qNGjhS3+YR /2scaQjxRe9ZhEVUROgWT35Gfzc8OfZ9bkBcB1WCX78EHa+AQOl72f4bQWpkwrgu JzaGRf7nYTUPVWVuwKL0uVurAqJmcqK885RL2CBRGmvoel7KZMxjE46cybXUy2wU EkYiiwGnhKzezZaJS17ddD52DmSKcUOd444lS8AbZSnmeL+zEt4WQsDT80MH7Nw= =0JTr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gDGSpKKIBgtShtf+--