Re: Opportunistic signatures - a proposed design
Jonathan Morton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.hashcash |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Just to clarify something here. For the enterprise solution, do you > envisage having one/many servers minting all email being sent outside > the organisation (I'm assuming that internal mail won't have have to > stamped as it is trusted), or do you see a solution where each client > PC runs its own minter? Ideally, minting happens at the MUA. But for a slow-moving enterprise, an MTA-based solution may be far easier to implement in the short term. It should be noted that an MTA-based solution is only feasible with a zero-UI design. A very large organisation may well find it cheaper and easier to put in a rack of Xserves to handle stamps and signatures, than to roll out an MUA upgrade to every desktop to do the same job. -------------------------------------------------------------- from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton mail: [email protected] website: http://www.chromatix.uklinux.net/ tagline: The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it.