[[email protected]: [Bug 78816] Hashcash support for Kmail]
Adam Back <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.hashcash |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Any dissent, send it to the bug url: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78816 Adam ----- Forwarded message from Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]> ----- Date: 6 Sep 2004 12:59:23 -0000 From: Ingo "Klöcker" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [Bug 78816] Hashcash support for Kmail ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are a voter for the bug, or are watching someone who is. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78816 kloecker kde org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From kloecker kde org 2004-09-06 14:59 ------- Being able to apply filters to messages before they are sent sometimes really makes sense. But does hashcash support really make sense? My problem with spam is that spamassassin still doesn't catch all of it. Usage of hashcash can't improve this. The usage of hashcash can only help lower the percentage of false positives. But so far no message which was sent with KMail (i.e. User-Agent: KMail/x.y.z) was falsely classified as spam. So I think the usage of hashcash will have exactly no effect. I will close this wish as duplicate of wish 48938 because once pre-sending filtering is implemented it can easily be used to add HashCash headers to your outgoing messages. I don't think it makes sense to add any hashcash specific code to KMail. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 48938 *** ----- End forwarded message -----